4 Comments
User's avatar
J.P.'s avatar
May 8Edited

This is a very interesting take on the renewable scam.

Option 1: "RENEWABLES"

$76 billion to build

$17 billion to maintain (annually)

Saving 115,000 tonnes of "carbon"

Versus

Option 2: REGENERATIVE AGRICULTURE

$4 billion to retrain and respec Australian farming practices

$0 to maintain

Saving ~105,000 tonnes of "carbon"

Yet all our pollies push option 1.

Now, read this for the LOGISTICS of option 1: https://fullbroadside.substack.com/p/full-broadsides-clean-energy-transition

Expand full comment
John Toomey's avatar

Beggers Belief JP.

Expand full comment
Graeme Pearce's avatar

Very good John, you can only believe that it’s money that’s controlling the debate.

Expand full comment
John Toomey's avatar

Too true Graeme.

Expand full comment